LIBERALISM SUCKS

This is not about investigating, arresting and convicting criminals, this is not about law enforcement at all. These are Marxist terrorist mercenaries with a stated goal of overthrowing the US. These people are committing acts of war. Terrorism is war. Anti-American terrorism is war against America.

One does not fight a war by investigating and arresting. One fights a war by locating the enemy and killing them. One does not fight these terrorists with law enforcement people, one fights them with the military and with citizen militias. And these militias fight this war by shooting and killing the terrorists, not by arresting them.

But what about all of the peaceful protesters among them?

These people are protesting some perceived injustice or another. But these crowds are being used (wittingly or unwittingly) as cover for the Marxist terrorists.

Here’s how you do it, find some issue to exploit and get a flash mob going. Now pepper this mob with paid Marxist terrorists, violent terrorists. There you have it, a mob that some can claim is “mostly peaceful”. But this is war and these gullible idiots are now in a war zone. These fools are providing cover for violent Marxist terrorists who are at war with the USA.

If some peaceful protesters get killed in the action so be it. That is just collateral damage. These crowds need to realize they are (knowingly or unknowingly) providing cover for violent terrorists.

Here is a weapon I think would be highly effective, a sniper drone.

Bring in a few of them and start taking out the looters, the vandals and the arsonists. No matter what enemies of the US may be paying them the price will skyrocket when the mercenaries start getting killed.

Recognize that BLM and ANTIFA are fake organizations that exploit people. BLM is not for black lives or any lives. To a true Marxist no lives really matter at all, only the Marxist cause. For an organization that allegedly opposes Fascism, ANTIFA are clearly violent Fascists. For both of these Marxist front organizations their names are pretty much the opposite of what they really are.

Oh, and save a couple of the sniper drones for George Soros.

Visit Izzy Weird’s new forum. Feel free to comment on any of the posts.

.

Link to Izzy’s Get Real forum:

https://mb.boardhost.com/Get-Real/

Donald Trump did not create a movement, rather a movement or a cluster of movements adopted him.

This is significant for this reason. The attempt to destroy or politically damage President Trump will not destroy these movements. While it may discourage many people to some degree, it is more likely to instill these movements with an even greater resolve.

Trump’s support comes from many sectors of public opinion. A lot of the sentiment is similar to that of the Tea Party groups. Much of Trump’s support comes from people who are dissatisfied with corruption and influence peddling in Washington, DC. A lot of his support comes from people who are concerned about the invasion of illegal aliens. These people are not anti-immigration. Immigration is a legal process, illegals are not immigrants.

Some of Trump’s support comes from people dissatisfied with the current state of the media. Other support comes from those concerned about the vast expansion of government bureaucracies. These un-elected bureaucrats are often creating laws and regulations beyond their constitutional authority.

Trump opponents make a huge mistake in thinking that all they have to do is discredit or destroy him and the movement behind him will disappear. This movement was here long before Trump and it will be here long after. The fanatical and irrational opposition to Trump merely illustrates to many of us that serious reform of the US government is even more desperately needed. This opposition also reveals this effort will take a lot more time and a lot more resolve.

Many of these are students, suckers who think they are getting an education. But what they are really getting is political indoctrination. They are being gypped by the tenured progressive activists at their schools. They are being made into both suckers and misguided fools.

A living wage for an 18-year-old still living at home, or four singles sharing an apartment is not the same as what a family of four might require.

And a living wage in one part of the country might be way overkill in an other.

So the entire concept a living wage is ludicrous.

What these noisy idiot protesters fail to recognize is that a minimum wage harms entry level workers and increases unemployment.  One is tempted to ask if some of these fools support a high minimum wage simply because it is harmful to a capitalist economy.

There should be NO MINIMUM WAGE. Wages are the business of the employer, not the government.

Watch the video, at the end some McDonalds customers start chanting, “You suck shit”.  LMAO this is a spontaneous counter demonstration.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/15/today-in-people-trying-to-screw-up-america-video/

But what we really need are Patriot Vigilantes, counter demonstrators who are already in place at these locations, and ready to lob arguments back at the protesters. It would be easy to get advance notice of a protest. Leftists have never been known for ethics or integrity. Just pay some mole for the information.

These vigilantes need to be carefully screened so they never incite violence. But they must be well prepared to defend themselves against the collectivist Fascist leftists. If the leftists get violent then the vigilantes need to bust some heads. That will be a truly educational experience for many of the protestors.

This is what former Vice President Al Gore might say after being injected with truth serum.

(Click picture to enlarge)

Picture URL:

http://liberalismsucks.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AlGore_truth_serum.jpg

King County Courthouse

With a population of about 2 million, King County, Washington is the 13th most populous county in the country. Since liberals like to fixate on matters of race, here is part of the racial makeup of the county. There are more Asians than Latinos or Hispanics, and the black population is less than half that of either Asians or Hispanics. It could be said that King County is one of the most white counties in the entire country.

The county seat is the city of Seattle, a city that would be less liberal if some of its residents would only return to the places where they were born.

In late 1882 King County was formed and named after William Rufus DeVane King who was Vice President at the time. There is some indication that Rufus King was gay.

William Rufus DeVane King

In 1986 a disgraceful and racist motion introduced by Ron Sims (a black Democrat and a crook) changed the naming of the county in disrespect of Rufus King and in honor of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

Excerpt from motion:

A MOTION setting forth the historical basis for “renaming” King County after the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., instead of William Rufus DeVane King for whom King County is currently named.

WHEREAS, the County of King in the State of Washington was named after William Rufus Devane King by the Oregon Territorial legislature in 1852, and

WHEREAS, William Rufus DeVane King was a slaveowner and a “gentle slave monger” according to John Quincy Adams, and

WHEREAS, the citizens of King County believe that the ownership of another human being is an injustice against humanity, and

WHEREAS, William Rufus DeVane King earned income and maintained his lifestyle by oppressing and exploiting other human beings, and

…

I’ll bet you thought that only Communists and Bolsheviks showed disrespect for their historical figures, pulled down statues and renamed places according to the latest political whim. But remember it is the Seattle neighborhood of Fremont where a statue of the Communist scumbag, Vladimir Lenin, stands.

So we dis Rufus King, and honor MLK because Rufus King owned slaves. But wait a minute, are we not going to rename the State of Washington? After all, George Washington owned slaves most of his life.

Chief Seattle

But it gets better, Chief Seattle owned slaves too, he owned eight of them when white men first arrived in the region. I guess we will have to create another shameful motion that disrespects Chief Seattle and renames the city to some new politically correct figure. How about Shawanttle?

Since when do we hold the people from our past to the more enlightened standards of today? Welcome to “Political Correctness Gone Wild”.

Let’s have a look at The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., an affirmative action plastic god if ever there was one.

MLK visited King County only once, to deliver a speech at the University of Washington. He was only here for a few days. His scholastic record is tarnished with charges of plagiarism. It is alleged that he used the works of others without attribution.

We have had many famous people in our history. Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln were arguably far more important than MLK. But MLK has a holiday in his honor, and these other great men share a single holiday.

White liberals attempt to assuage their white guilt by elevating MLK to a status the man does not deserve. White liberals are terrified of black people becoming violent. So MLK’s non-violence was something they desperately wanted to promote. Granted MLK made some fine speeches, but the only reason so many things are named in his honor was because of the color of his skin.

Former King County Executive, Ron Sims, left another enduring mark upon King County, Washington. He changed our voting method to mail-in only. Now, liberals need not fear conservative voters. And conservative voters in King County can no longer be confident their votes will be counted.

“It’s not the people who vote that count. It’s the people who count the votes.” (Sometimes attributed to Josef Stalin)

If someone were to ask you for whom King County, Washington was named, just tell them it was ORIGINALLY named in honor of William Rufus DeVane King.

Mention mandate, directive, or requirement and many progressive liberals have a Pavlovian reaction, they salivate and some even drool. 

What is it that causes them have this apparently irresistible and neurotic desire for centralized government control?

Conversely, mention self reliance (especially self defense), or self determination and many liberals will visibly bristle.  Their emotional reaction to such a notion is consistent with someone who perceives a personal threat.

Why is it that progressive liberals so strongly favor a tightly controlled population?  Why are liberals such central control freaks?

One possible reason is that progressives and liberals are “order freaks”.

Liberals and progressives may be suffering from Ataxophobia, the fear of disorder. 

For them society is much too chaotic, much too disorderly.  A chaotic society is more difficult to understand, perhaps impossible to understand.  The chaos of free capitalism is a fearsome thing for them.  The order of Marxism, Communism, or Socialism (even Fascism) is far less fearsome.  Thus it is much easier to comprehend and understand.

Never mind that these systems never seem to function as planned.  Never mind that such concentrated power inevitably becomes dictatorial and even brutal and murderous.  Never mind that personal freedom and individual rights are usually sacrificed for some notion of a “common good”.  The liberal/progressive mind has such a neurotic fear of chaos that none of these horrible side effects seem to matter.

The choice is one of almost pure emotion, a knee-jerk reaction to the fear of chaos and disorder.  Logical arguments, like the history of concentrated government power are simply ignored.  Liberals are so afraid of chaos and unpredictability that they are virtually blind to the threat of big government tyranny.

Liberals often cite the fallibility of human beings, the fact that capitalism is driven by greed, and that greed and ambition often drive people to exploit and abuse others.  But they seem oblivious to the fact that strong authoritarian statist systems suffer from the same human fallibilities.  The same humans who run big corporations also run big governments.  To varying degrees, a lot of the same greed and ambition drives all of these people.

It can be argued that when comparing political leaders to corporate leaders, corporations are considerably better at attracting talent.  Corporations are somewhat less likely to attract the corrupt, and corporations considerably better at attracting natural leaders.

There is a reason why we strive to distribute authority, and why we try to create systems with checks and balances.  This is because we recognize that humans are imperfect, and that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

The fear of chaos and disorder is emotional and irrational, and it leads people toward the false security of big government tyranny.

Our special modified version of the Seattle sign tells what Gun Free Zone signs are really saying.

You have to laugh at these terminally stupid Seattle liberals.  But it really isn’t funny, this is the kind of stupidity that gets people killed.  Sandy Hook Elementary School was a Gun Free Zone, the Century 16 multiplex in Arizona where 12 people died and 70 were injured was also a Gun Free Zone.

Most armed robbers and mass murdering nuts are also cowards.  They want to avoid any place where someone is likely to shoot back.  Gun-grabbing NAZI states like New York have rendered their citizens helpless and incapable of defending themselves.  The cowardly racist nut who opened up on the passengers of a Long Island Railroad commuter train knew he was less likely to encounter return fire.

If you live in Seattle and find a business displaying this sign, perhaps you should inform them that it makes both patrons and employees less safe, not more safe.  Tell them you will try to minimize the time you spend in a place which advertises that everyone is unarmed.

This is so typical of liberal lunacy.  They set out to solve a problem, but the idiotic way in which they go about it usually exacerbates the problem.  When the solution involves government, the attempt at a solution often wastes a lot of money while simultaneously making the problem worse.  Liberals also seem to salivate at any solution that curtails individual rights and freedoms.

“Please allow me to come in and demonstrate the 1935 Marx-O-Matic Suckmaster Deluxe, the vacuum that didn’t work then and doesn’t work now. Let’s just pretend it really works. And if it doesn’t work we can always blame someone else.

Let’s also ignore the fact that it has already killed over 100 million people.

This model is guaranteed to make you Hope for Change.”

This is a familiar claim made by some on the left, and it does not stand up to scrutiny.

Remember that many on the right are supply-siders. We know that reducing taxes will often spur an economy. We know this because it has been proven out a number of times. The most recent example would be the Bush tax cuts of 2003. GDP growth increased considerably after these cuts.

(click images to expand)

Income and Capital Gains tax revenue also increased. These cuts did not cost us, they did not increase the deficit, that is another common liberal lie.

Conversely, tax hikes are often recessionary, this is basic Economics 101 stuff.

If I were in the GOP controlled congress and I really wanted to sabotage the economy, I could do it easily. All I would have to do get a bill passed that increased the upper marginal income tax rate (and only the upper rate) to 40%. Then I would increase the Capital Gains tax to 25%.

By the way, for those of you who are (NEA union goon) math challenged, that is a 67% increase, not a 10% increase. Here is the math:

((25/15) -1) * 100 = 67% increase

If the Republicans in congress were not patriots, and if they were willing to make the country suffer to damage Barack Obama that is all they would have to do, raise taxes.  Isn’t this what Barack Obama says he wants?

Do you really think the Democratically controlled Senate would be stupid enough to actually pass a similar bill? Do you actually think Barack Obama would sign it?

I tend to think that even these poor misguided demand-side Keynesian fools would know better than to increase these taxes. But these hypocrites will still attempt to make people believe that tax increases would help reduce the deficit.

I think Barack Obama is clearly an economic illiterate, he must have been cutting class and smoking crack when he should have been attending lectures. So it is possible that he would go along with such foolish increases.

The result would be dramatic, and Americans would suffer economically far more than they are suffering now.

This silly claim is probably a matter of projection on the part of liberals and progressives. For them their cause is more of a pseudo-religion. Progressives would be far more likely to take action that would do great harm to the country, if they thought it would further their “noble” cause. Progressives are notably more un-American and anti-American. They are quite capable of putting their ideology ahead of their country. Republicans and conservatives are far less likely to put their ideology ahead of their country.